As so often happens, those who build great enterprises or who shape the future rarely take time from their considerable endeavors to clearly record how they achieved what they did. King Musical Instruments is a shell today of the great twentieth century American instrument maker that it was, but the activities of H.N. White & Co., the company that eventually adopted its longtime tradename “King”, significantly helped shape the evolution of band instruments and the school music movement. There are a handful of rare instruments that survive from before H.N. White had the resources to manufacture more than a few hand-built trombones, and they give us a sense and vision of the earliest days of the company. Recently, a restored cornet of a previously unseen-in-modern-times attribution has surfaced and may be the oldest surviving cornet sold by Mr. White in his fledgling business. Once understood in context, it and other survivors allow a reconstruction of the probable activities of the early firm, and shed light on how that time differed less than we might think from our own.
Henderson White was born in the then less than a century old farm town of Romeo Michigan on July 16th 1873 to carpenter and builder George M. White and his wife Eliza. Born there, George would spend his entire short life from 1839 to 1879 in the small town. With his father having died when Henderson was only 6, by age 12 he had to leave school and apprentice to a builder named Galloway as a carpenter. At age 14, apparently finding his father’s trade not his direction in life, Henderson White took up employment in the Detroit music store of Mr. O.F. Berden where he discovered his talent for instrument repair and engraving. By age 16, what must have been a natural talent for the trade had already made his name known in the business and he was recruited to leave Detroit for Cleveland Ohio.
Both the 1910 biography of White in Samuel P. Orth’s History of Cleveland and great-grandson Chris Charvat’s biography on the website www.hnwhite.com, speak to White working for McMillin’s music store for 5 years. When White moved to Cleveland at age 16, the year would have been at least late 1889. However, in 1889, George McMillin was still employed in the music publishing house of J.G. Richards & Co.. According to the Presto trade publication’s December 1924 obituary for McMillin, who died of a stroke at his desk at work, McMillin “parted ways” with Richards and started his firm in 1892. Charvat records that White briefly partnered in the firm Berg & White before becoming sole owner of the company in 1893. At best that leaves 5 calendar years between his arrival and the partnership, but only 2 during which McMillin’s store was in business. It can only be guessed that perhaps he worked with McMillin at J.G. Richards, or that perhaps McMillin opened his store before leaving Richards.
Regardless of his employer during his first years, in 1893 Henderson White partnered with C.H. Berg, whose sister Elizabeth became his wife on September 20th 1894. By that time the partnership was over and H.N. White had opened a small music store on Woodland Avenue. It is this point in the history of King Musical Instruments into which the recently rediscovered cornet gives us a new perspective.
At the website Horn-u-copia.net one can find several similarly inscribed cornets indicating that they were sold by a “sole agent” for Cleveland. Some of these are engraved with McMillin’s name and some with White’s. Horns made by one firm labeled for sale by another are known as “stencil” horns. Previously known White stencils are labeled with the name “Silver Star”, “Union” or “Imperial”. The McMillin horns are engraved with an attribution to “Geo. Baring & Co. London Eng.” – though no other trace of that firm seems to exist. In both cases, the bell engraving is usually simple text. Common distinct elements appear across names and models, but occasionally elements also are distinct by agent name on otherwise same models.
The newly rediscovered cornet is a near-perfect copy of a lesser known Besson short cornet. When comparing, one must compensate for minor visual differences that result from the largely manual process of bending and forming brass instruments in the 19th century, but the commonality of parts and general form can be seen upon close inspection. The only obvious non-Besson attribute of the horn is that the tuning slide brace has no diamond-shaped escutcheons at the ends. When comparing to the 1896 version of the Besson original, it can be seen that the Besson ferrules used at the valve slide radius unions are more elaborate than on this horn or a matching McMillin stencil attributed to Baring & Co. However, Besson restructured in 1894 with a public stock offering and began a series of changes to design elements over the following years. By 1900, not only had these ferrules changed, but the tuning slide brace became a wire loop, the all metal thin finger buttons became taller pearl-topped ones and the valve caps onto which they descended changed to use felts, eliminating the problematic cork risers.
An 1896 Besson A McMillin by Baring & the subject White by Bauer
The engraving on the White stencil cornet attributed to M. Bauer reads
SUPERIOR
M. BAUER & CO.
H.N. WHITE
SOLE AGENT
CLEVELAND O.
The typeface, format, placement and so on are completely consistent with the Silver Star / White cornets that are well documented. The questions of who made the instrument, when and why can only be considered through deduction and testing of hypothesis.
It is best to work through the attributions on the bell line by line. The first, “Superior”, appears inconsistently on instruments that list H.N. White as “sole agent”. Some have treated Superior Silver Star and Silver Star as separate trade names. The identical usage of the word on this instrument, along with the difference in typeface from the next line in either case, suggest strongly that superior is not a part of the tradename, but rather is a quality declaration. Many British instruments of the time, as well as others, would have “Class A” or “Class B” and so on denoting the quality of the particular model as the first line of the bell engraving. The first logical deduction regarding this horn then is that young Henderson White observed this in the instruments he sold at his earlier music store jobs and decided to copy it -but with his own, more American sounding classification.
To derive a sound supposition similarly with regard to the second line is a more complex question. To consider fully if “M Bauer & Co.” is a made-up entity, one must consider the other contrived brands and tradenames of the time as well as the possibility of a real firm.
McMillin, where White worked immediately prior to starting a business in which he too would sell stencils, sold stencil horns attributed to the firm of George Baring & Co in London. There seems to be no record of George Baring and his firm in England at the time. A George Baring had founded Barings & Co. in London in 1802 to engage in far-east trade, and Baring Brothers & Co. (Barings Bank) was the world’s best known mercantile bank, but no record seems to remain of a firm in London by the name of George Baring that made instruments. The notability of the Baring name, being an old, globally known family of politicians and bankers, would undoubtedly have seemed familiar and prestigious to potential customers. Based on the lack of evidence of Geo. Baring & Co., as well as the generally pricey nature of British and French instruments of the time, a second deduction may then be that McMillin created the name of a fictitious London firm to enhance the image of a supplier-built generic cornet.
likewise, the Bauer name was known in the Midwestern United States in the 1890s through the Julius Bauer Piano Company that sold stencil horns in his “J. Bauer” name that were made by his Bohemian cousins, principally Eduard Johann and Johann Adam Bauer in the 1860s and 1870s. By the early 1890s, one notable cousin was still producing these instruments, that being Albin Bauer. Matthaus Bauer built a variety of instruments including brass in Vienna starting before 1838, but his details of construction including ornamentation, elaborate marking, bracing, and traditional rotary valve imperial wraps differ vastly from this horn. Starting before 1838, it is doubtful he still would have been building at all in 1894.
There do not appear to be any “M. Bauer” signed brass instruments from 1890s Europe. A New York Times notice of probate indicates that Julius Bauer died in 1884 leaving his wife Anna Marie and her brother Andrew Mueller in charge of the estate. Later, his son William would head the firm but Julius’ name was retained on the instruments until the firm was taken over by Wurlitzer during the great depression. Known brass instruments by various Bauers include rotary and berliner valves, but no perinet valve horns. Given that the only Bauer who’s name started with M would have been quite old in the 1890s and never built anything similar, this seems well able to have been another example of playing on a familiar sounding name. The third deduction thus is that the name M. Bauer on this horn is a case of H.N. White following the example of his recent mentor, not just in supplier choice, but in fabricating a familiar sounding European maker to add prestige to his supplier-built instrument.
While building this chain of supposition, the next logical answer that can be deduced regards the point in the H.N. White corporate history where this instrument best fits. As noted above, the ferrules indicate that this is a copy of a pre-1896, possibly pre-1894 restructuring, Besson. White sold stencil cornets in the 1890s and even into the 1900s using tradenames rather than those of a purported maker. As he continued to use tradenames on lines of instruments of his own making, the flagship of which was King, but which included examples such as liberty, Silvertone, Silversonic and Silver Flair, through the end of his life, it stands to reason that the differing practice of naming a maker must pre-date that of using a tradename. Logically then, the fourth deduction must be that this “M. Bauer” horn predates his other stencil products and may reasonably date from 1894 give or take a year.
The remaining three lines are consistent with all of the stencil horns sold by the H.N. White Company that exist and demonstrate almost conclusively that this is one of those horns. The leather satchel case accompanying the cornet also is of the dark textured leather common at the turn of the twentieth century and appropriately aged. While it is not impossible, it is extremely improbable that this instrument could be an expensive and incredibly complex hoax targeting King aficionados. Taking into account the serial number on the second valve casing, which is 7, the fifth, and most significant, deduction regarding this horn is that this is among the first cornets, and for that matter instruments, ever sold by Henderson N. White in his own business.
Where the instrument was manufactured cannot be so easily deduced and may forever defy knowing. As shown above, there are identical horns as both White & McMillin stencils. This suggests strongly that they shared one or more suppliers of these instruments. There are those including some at horn-u-copia.net who treat George Baring & Co. as a real company attributing White & McMillin stencil cornets to it -though as already noted, that is unlikely. Likewise, Matthaus Bauer existed near the time in question, but is equally improbable as the maker. Fabrication of the McMillin and White stencils has also been attributed to Alexandre Le Forestier, who apprenticed at Besson, worked for Curtois and Distin, and was a foreman at Pepper before setting up an instrument making shop in Philadelphia. Given the intense similarity to established makers’ cornets built near that time, speculation that they are factory seconds, or absconded parts and designs straight from the design originator’s plants, also is not entirely dismissible.
One possible source for these horns is the Standard Band Instrument Company of Boston. In 1862 David Hall founded the firm at 62 Sudbury Street across from the successful E.G. Wright factory that also housed Graves & Sons – who combined in 1869 to become Boston Musical Instrument Manufactory. Hall struggled and took on new partners reincorporating in 1870, and 1871. In 1876, his partners bought him out and formed Quinby brothers, which in turn failed and was purchased by the struggling publishing house of Thompson & Odell in an attempt to diversify in 1889.
Thompson & Odell Publishing fared poorly and was absorbed by Carl Fischer in 1901. By 1905 what had been named the Standard Band Instrument Company was bankrupt and negotiating to be purchased by Vega Banjo – as happened in 1909.
Sometime during the transition to Vega, a cornet closely matching the Bauer/White and Baring/McMillin was produced under the “Vega made by the Standard Band Instrument Company” label and listing the old DC Hall address.
By the turn of the century,
White was ready to expand and produce his own cornets.
Failing companies routinely stretch the life cycle of old product and by the time Vega was involved with Standard, this model would be dated. likewise it is reasonable to suppose that a struggling firm, which Standard was historically, particularly during the economic upheaval of the 1890s, would have been willing to sell product for others to stencil under their own names.
While it must also be acknowledged that the bankrupt Standard could have been sourcing this horn outside themselves to reduce labor costs, it would have been poor strategy to choose such an outdated model. like so many instruments today, all we know for certain is that McMillin and White were sourcing generic product from a low-cost supplier and branding them for their use.
(1905-9 Vega/Standard photo above)
This, then, is our first glimpse into the early days of the H.N. White Company: As Henderson White, then only 20 and getting married, ventured out on his own in business, he must have split his time between business requirements such as stocking and the books, and his workbench where, when not repairing customer instruments, he could produce a very few “King” trombones -tradenamed after Thomas King, who had helped him perfect his design. Perhaps it is White himself, noted as an engraver amongst other skills, who stenciled these first cornets upon their arrival at his bench.
By the turn of the century, White was ready to expand and produce his own cornets with the King Famous Short (1906 pictured left), King Large Bore, King Small Bore, and King Long Model cornets. In the first decade of the century, Conn, Holton, York, Lyon & Healy and others all were experimenting with new designs for larger, heavier and more conical cornets. In designing his first horns, H.N. White elected to expand upon the old-looking, but proven, wrap he knew from Besson and Conn. White and McMillin had stenciled horns similar to the C.G. Con Wonder design as well as Besson horns, and Conn in the 1890s was marketing this exact wrap in one of their other cornets. History ultimately vindicated this choice of design, as that simple wrap out-lived all of the wild contemporary creations of the early twentieth century, becoming the standard form of the modern cornet. Pictured at right are the original 1860s Besson wrap and the Conn version circa 1897.
Continuing the early story of HN White, in 1906 he finally moved from the small shop into a production facility at 1870 East Ninth Street, before which his capacity must have been severely limited. His stencil cornets have by many been believed to date from the time between the establishment of his first store and his entry into cornet manufacturing around 1900. However, a White stencil “Imperial” cornet appears to be based on a C.G. Conn New Invention Circus Bore Cornet, which replaced the nearly identical Perfected Wonder model in 1910 and was based on a circa 1900 Lyon & Healy. Whichever horn was the pattern, the stencil must post-date White’s first King cornets. It interestingly shares a distinct detail with McMillin’s Crown brand cornets circa 1905, which is a knurled rope accent on the union ferrules. This suggests continued sharing of a new supplier. Thus one may plausibly deduce that White continued selling stencils alongside his own cornets in order to give his rapidly expanding distribution network more variety than he had the capacity to make perhaps until the larger factory at 5225 Superior Avenue was fully operational after 1911.
C.G. Conn New Invention Circus Bore Imperial, HN White Sole Agent, Cleveland O.
So, through supposition based on what record remains and surviving instruments, the world of young Henderson White in the first decade of what would grow rapidly into one of the world’s leading and most innovative band instrument companies comes into view – if only a little bit. He maximized his own skills and meager capital, using techniques not unlike those used by instrument retailers still today, to provide the widest selection at the lowest price he could, in order to facilitate that growth and ultimate achievement. It was the stencil horns, the equivalent of our Chinese-produced horns with familiar old names, as well as name-of-the-month horns through online retailers, which ultimately built the customer base and funded the expansion into a full manufacturing concern -which then grew into the band instrument powerhouse that lasted most of the twentieth century. The young Mr. White could have been born over a century later, followed the same life plan, and prospered to the same degree as he did -as the business model has not changed nearly as much as we might wish to believe.
Sources: